Not particularly useful as Classifieds, but beautiful as posters.
y'know that guy from nz
His name is Ludwig Wendzich and he doesn't usually speak in the third person. He lives in Auckland, New Zealand after emigrating from South Africa when he was seven years old.
He has a passion for art and design. He is currently a web designer stroke developer who has a particular interest in designing the user experience; mixing usability and accessibility with aesthetics to maximize efficiency and enjoyment.
Not particularly useful as Classifieds, but beautiful as posters.
I asked him if he would come up with a few options, and he said, ‘No, I will solve your problem for you and you will pay me. You don’t have to use the solution. If you want options go talk to other people.’
I love this video because it’s about two men who get it. They understand the power of specialisation and they can trust someone to do their job. I will solve the problem for you, if you want options go talk to other people.
— “Notes on Improvisation and Design” by Liz Danzico
Great talk by Liz drawing comparisons between music and design and more specifically the analogy of the more structured classical music (where the emphasis is placed on the creation/composition of the original work) compared to the more accessible Modal Jazz (where the emphasis is placed on the moment, the consumption of the music, the interaction between the performers and audience in the now.)
A great quote from Liz:
You think you’re hearing individual notes, you’re not. You’re hearing motion, you’re hearing what you expect to hear next. Your brain, listens for patterns, and then thinks in terms of expectations. As designers, I think that this is highly important, because we’re not thinking about individual pieces of information, yet we’re thinking about what is to come, what patterns can we imagine into the future.
How people understand and often misunderstand each other fascinates me. How is something that makes so much sense to me so completely misunderstood by someone else. Why is it so hard for someone to learn a new language, despite knowing the words, and even speak their own language in a different country.
When I go back to visit South Africa and speak Afrikaans to the people there, despite the fact that we are both speaking the same language, the way we talk is completely different and what I say is not understood by them and what they say confounds me as to what they mean.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. argue in “Concepts we live by”, Chapter 1 in “Metaphors we live by” that this is because our thought processes and understanding are largely metaphorical, metaphor is nor just a matter of language, that is, of mere words. We shall argue that, on the contrary, human thought processes are largely metaphorical.
(Emphasis theirs.)
They use the example of the extended metaphor that our culture uses, Argument is War.
- Your claims are indefensible.
- He attacked every weak point in my argument
- His criticisms were right on target
- I demolished his argument
- I’ve never won an argument with him.
- You disagree? Okay, shoot!
- If you use that strategy, he’ll wipe you out.
- He shot down all of my arguments.
Without the understanding of the extended metaphor, our intentions are misunderstood. It’s not just about understand the language, the words, it’s also about understanding the society, their thinking, the extended metaphors they share.
In terms of design, this is also applicable. Just as we speak based on metaphor, we also design based on metaphor. Someone won’t understand your designs if they don’t share the same extended metaphors you have, so when you design for an audience it’s important to understand that market and how they think. Don’t be surprised if they don’t understand your work if you didn’t take the time to learn to understand them.
Nobody (save the other craftsmen) will appreciate half your skill. But you may spend endless years of happy experiment in devising that crystalline goblet which is worthy to hold the vintage of the human mind.
— Beatrice Ward, “The Crystal Goblet”, Excerpt from a Lecture to the British Typographers’ Guild
Commentary: Our work is to make someone else’s work shine. Whether we are typesetting an author’s novel, designing for a bands album cover, coming up with a billboard or a website for a company’s product. Our work, is to make our client’s work, stand out and be clear and understandable.
Modernist design ethics suggest that design should be invisible, form follows function. This view point on design is debatable, my favourite retort has been along the lines of “no one wants to drive an invisible Ferrari.” So what is design’s role? To disappear or to awe?
I love the interaction model here, utilising different planes for different ways to organise content. Might want to use this for the “issues” design for my theory journal.
Photography by Burak Arikan that shows the importance of simplicity and uniqueness in flag design for recognition purposes. I assume the same can be applied to most logos with similar success.
Pricespy may have been ugly, but at least it was useful. Now the “design” is getting in the way of it being useless. I prefer ugly useful PriceSpy over new and improved Pricespy.
“Apple’s Jonathon Ive gets obsessed about design” - via PBS